Wednesday, 16 September 2015
Thursday, 27 August 2015
Friday, 7 August 2015
fine-tune guiding
It seems that bad quality of the raspberry pi camera caused a lot of problem. the image quality is really poor, so the stars position which was calculated based on the image was really inaccurate. After applying some filters the result is much better.
The first image is the picture of a star from the camera.. The second is the same picture after median filter. The third image is after applying sharpening. The last one is after removing dark gray pixels.
After all these finding the center of the star is much more accurate.
The orange line shows the star position before these fixes were implemented. The blue line shows the star position after the fix. It seems that the line is more smooth than before. After applying 3 step moving average (red line) is smooth enough for guiding.
![]() |
| M27, 6x150 sec exp, ISO800, 150/750 newton |
Wednesday, 22 July 2015
Monday, 13 July 2015
Thursday, 9 July 2015
Plan
M20-M21
|
Laguna
|
S
|
Equinox
|
OK!!
|
|
M8
|
S
|
Equinox
|
ok!!!
|
||
M16
|
Eagle-nebula
|
S
|
750
|
ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
M17
|
Omega-nebula
|
S
|
750
|
ok
|
|
scorpio
|
Milky-way
|
S
|
38mm
|
ok
|
|
graff’s cluster
|
S
|
Equinix
|
ok !
|
||
M24
|
S
|
Equinox
|
teszt!!!!!!!!!!!
|
||
heart nebula
|
N
|
Equinox
|
try
|
||
soul nebula
|
N
|
Equinox
|
try
|
||
NGC884
|
double cluster
|
N
|
Equinox
|
OK!!
|
|
M51
|
W
|
??
|
ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
10x300s
|
|
M33
|
galaxy
|
E
|
maybe / hard
|
||
M34
|
E
|
maybe / hard
|
|||
M31
|
Andromeda
|
E
|
Equinox
|
ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
M27
|
Dumbell N.
|
E
|
ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
||
M52
|
E
|
try / hard
|
|||
Veil Nebula
|
E
|
10d 90,mm
|
try
|
||
Sunday, 5 July 2015
Wednesday, 1 July 2015
Tuesday, 23 June 2015
Thursday, 4 June 2015
Thursday, 30 April 2015
Guiding error 4
I've just checked if there is any delay between sending the message to change the motor speed and the actual change. The delay is about 5 frames, which is around 0.3 second.
![]() |
| Grey bars shows the message to the motor, blue line shows the star position. |
This explains why i had that sinus like movement of the star. I started the compensation too late, and also stopped it too late.
To solve this, it's not enough to check the star's position, but also need to check the movement of the star. If it's moving to the proper direction, the compensation should be smaller, if not, the compensation should be even bigger.
The blue line shows the star's position, the red line shows the position and also added the gradient of the movement. If the value of the position is increasing (like around 50 on the chart above), the red line is much higher, so we need more compensation. If the blue line is decreasing, the red line is lower, we need less compensation.
The guiding is much smoother like this, but in same cases the maximum compensation is not enough, so that parameter should be increased, and the compensation should be more aggressive.




















